Multilevel Alignment Maintains Language systematicity

نویسندگان

  • Remi van Trijp
  • Luc Steels
چکیده

The question how a shared vocabulary can arise in a multi-agent population despite the fact that each agent autonomously invents and acquires words has been solved. The solution is based on alignment: Agents score all associations between words and meanings in their lexicons and update these preference scores based on communicative success. A positive feedback loop between success and use thus arises which causes the spontaneous self-organization of a shared lexicon. The same approach has been proposed for explaining how a population can arrive at a shared grammar, in which we get the same problem of variation because each agent invents and acquires their own grammatical constructions. However, a problem arises if constructions reuse parts that can also exist on their own. This happens particularly when frequent usage patterns, which are based on compositional rules, are stored as such. The problem is how to maintain systematicity. This paper identifies this problem and proposes a solution in the form of multilevel alignment. Multilevel alignment means that the updating of preference scores is not restricted to the constructions that were used in the utterance but also downward and upward in the subsumption hierarchy.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the Systematicity of Language and Thought

The last twenty years or so have seen a lot of discussion about systematicity-roughly the idea that if a person's repertoire contains the sentence/thought thatJohn loves Mary, then her repertoire also contains the sentence/thought that Mary loves John.' Much of the discussion of systematicity has focused on the technical question of whether and how connectionists can explain the systematicity o...

متن کامل

Systematicity and Natural Language Syntax1

A lengthy debate in the philosophy of the cognitive sciences has turned on whether the phenomenon known as ‘systematicity’ of language and thought shows that connectionist explanatory aspirations are misguided. We investigate the issue of just which phenomenon ‘systematicity’ is supposed to be. The much-rehearsed examples always suggest that being systematic has something to do with ways in whi...

متن کامل

Strong Systematicity within Connectionism: The Tensor-Recurrent Network

Systematicity, the ability to represent and process structurally related objects, is a significant and pervasive property of cognitive behaviour, and clearly evident in language. In the case of Connectionist models that learn from examples, systematicity is generalization over examples sharing a common structure. Although Connectionist models (e.g., the recurrent network and its variants) have ...

متن کامل

Connectionist Semantic Systematicity in Language Production

A novel connectionist model of sentence production is presented, which employs rich situation model representations originally proposed for modeling systematicity in comprehension (Frank, Haselager, & van Rooij, 2009). The high overall performance of our model demonstrates that such representations are not only suitable for comprehension, but also for modeling language production. Further, the ...

متن کامل

Strong systematicity in sentence processing by simple recurrent networks

Providing explanations of language comprehension requires models that describe language processing and display strong systematicity. Although various extensions of connectionist models have been suggested in order to account for this phenomenon, we found that even a simple recurrent network that had been trained in a way that can be considered ‘standard’, could display strong systematicity. Thi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Advances in Complex Systems

دوره 15  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012